The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons as – TYMoff

Introduction:

The 1982 horror classic “Poltergeist” has long been surrounded by rumors and urban legends, with one of the most infamous being the use of real skeletons in certain scenes. This article delves into the truth behind these claims and explores the controversy surrounding the film’s production. We are covering topic of The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As Props – Tymoff

The Controversy:

One of the most chilling aspects of “Poltergeist” is the scene where a swimming pool is unearthed, revealing a collection of skeletons. Rumors suggest that these skeletons were not props but actual human remains, sourced from medical supply companies due to their realistic appearance and cost-effectiveness.

However, the film’s producer, Steven Spielberg, and director, Tobe Hooper, have vehemently denied these claims. They maintain that the skeletons were, in fact, realistic props made from plastic and rubber. Despite these assurances, the rumor has persisted over the years, adding to the film’s mystique.

The Truth Revealed:

In 1987, an article in the Los Angeles Times shed light on the controversy. It was revealed that real skeletons were, indeed, used in the film. The article detailed how the production team acquired the skeletons from a medical supply company, believing them to be more realistic and cost-effective than synthetic alternatives.

The use of real skeletons sparked outrage among some members of the cast and crew, who were unaware of the source of the props. Actress JoBeth Williams, who starred in the film, later expressed her discomfort upon learning the truth for The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As Props – Tymoff.

Legal and Ethical Implications:

The use of real skeletons in “Poltergeist” raised legal and ethical questions regarding the treatment of human remains in the film industry. While the skeletons were obtained legally from a reputable source, the controversy highlighted the need for clearer guidelines and oversight in the use of such props.

Conclusion:

The use of real skeletons in “Poltergeist” remains a controversial and haunting aspect of the film’s legacy. While the filmmakers maintain that the skeletons were used for their realism and cost-effectiveness, the controversy surrounding their use has cast a shadow over the production. As audiences continue to be fascinated by the mysteries of “The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As Props – Tymoff,” the truth behind the skeletons remains a chilling reminder of the film’s dark and enigmatic nature.

FAQs: The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As Props – Tymoff

1. Did the movie “Poltergeist” really use real skeletons?

• Yes, it is confirmed that real skeletons were used in certain scenes of the movie “Poltergeist.”

2. Why were real skeletons used in the film?

• The production team believed that real skeletons would provide a more realistic and cost-effective option for the scenes requiring them.

3. Were the cast and crew aware that real skeletons were being used?

• No, not all of the cast and crew were aware of the source of the skeletons. Some members, including actress JoBeth Williams, expressed discomfort upon learning the truth.

4. How were the skeletons obtained?

• The skeletons were acquired from a medical supply company, which was a common practice in the film industry at the time.

5. What was the reaction to the use of real skeletons in the film?

• The use of real skeletons sparked outrage among some members of the cast and crew, who were unaware of their origin. This raised legal and ethical questions regarding the treatment of human remains in the film industry.

6. Did the filmmakers face any consequences for using real skeletons?

• While the use of real skeletons in “Poltergeist” caused controversy, there were no legal consequences as the skeletons were obtained legally from a reputable source.

7. How has the use of real skeletons impacted the legacy of “Poltergeist”?

• The controversy surrounding the use of real skeletons has added to the mystique of the film and remains a chilling aspect of its legacy. It has also raised awareness about the treatment of human remains in the film industry.